Loaded data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\\HL\3.48\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequencesNonCan_20.mat
AUCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.05, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GCUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.90, deficit  0.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
UGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UUUA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.55, deficit  0.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
ACCU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.90, deficit  1.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.90, deficit  0.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -9.72, deficit  4.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.56, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -8.00, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UCAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.67, deficit  0.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -9.72, deficit  4.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UUCA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.04, deficit  0.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.97, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AGGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.22, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CAGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCCG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_53189.1,  5 NTs,                 CUCUG,score      -4.71, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53                     
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GACCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.94, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GAGGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUGUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGAGU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.81, deficit  1.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.69, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGCGG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.74, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
GCAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.83, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.49, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
AAGAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.06, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90197.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAGG,score      -5.75, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-s35                             
GAGAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.94, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UUCUA 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.91, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.67, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CCAUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -7.87, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.00, deficit  2.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGCAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.54, deficit  0.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.19, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
AGCAU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CCUCG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.38, deficit  1.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
AUCUU 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.90, deficit  0.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GCGUC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -9.29, deficit  6.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.97, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCCC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_80171.1,  5 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.26, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33                     
GCGAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.83, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.49, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
UGGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -6.91, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUGC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.37, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GGCGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGCGG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.74, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
UGUGA 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -4.82, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CUUUCG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.80, deficit  0.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.95, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GGUGGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -6.00, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CCAAUG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.49, deficit  0.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CAGCGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.23, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.28, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
GGUGAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.75, deficit  0.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GGUCAC 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_44781.1,  5 NTs,                GUUCAC,score      -3.80, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35             
CCAGAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.39, deficit  0.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGGGGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.29, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GUCACC 1  Matches 11; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.32, deficit  5.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGUCGC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -5.78, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CCAGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.91, deficit  1.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GUAAUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.58, deficit  0.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
AUAAUU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.53, deficit  0.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CUAGUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.23, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CUUCCG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_46463.1,  4 NTs,                UUUCGA,score      -5.15, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUGGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -5.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUCCG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_46463.1,  4 NTs,                UUUCGA,score      -5.15, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AAUCAU 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_01008.4,  5 NTs,                GAUCAC,score      -3.00, deficit  0.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.26, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F                       
CUAAUG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.47, deficit  0.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CUUACG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.39, deficit  0.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GAGGAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.97, deficit  0.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UAGAAA 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -6.83, deficit  0.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUGGCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CCGAAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_15942.4,  4 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -6.46, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.54, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
AGAGGU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.40, deficit  2.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
AUUAUU 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.55, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.99, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCUCG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGAGGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_18785.1,  5 NTs,                UAAGGG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.14, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35                             
UUGGUA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -3.88, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.52, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSH                             
CGAAGG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.60, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUAUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_60357.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -3.41, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CUUGUG 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -5.55, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAACG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.89, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.52, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGUCAC 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_44781.1,  5 NTs,                GUUCAC,score      -3.80, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35             
GGUCGC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -5.78, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
UGAAGG 1  Matches 22; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.48, deficit  4.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.97, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GAAACC 1  Matches 25; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.13, deficit  4.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.67, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGCAGC 1  Matches 22; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.03, deficit  5.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.28, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUGAUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_29487.1,  6 NTs,                CUGAUG,score      -2.34, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s35-s55                       
CGCUAG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -8.88, deficit  7.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
CGCGGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.62, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.80, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
CUCUCG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAAAAC 1  Matches 30; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.24, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.52, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CCGGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -6.72, deficit -0.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
CGAAGG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.60, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GCUACC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.29, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GUGGCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.49, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGUUGC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -5.78, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CGAGAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GCAGGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -6.08, deficit  1.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UGUCGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -5.80, deficit  2.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
AUCUCUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score     -10.69, deficit  6.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
AUCAUUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -7.03, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GUCAACC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -5.94, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.14, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GUUUCUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -5.82, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
UAACUAA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -7.97, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CACAACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -5.98, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.76, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CUGACUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -6.26, deficit  2.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
UAAGACA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -5.91, deficit  2.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
CAUGAGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_96487.1,  4 NTs,               CAUGUAG,score      -6.62, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGUUUAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -7.93, deficit  3.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.88, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CAAAUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.96, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CCAAUUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -8.39, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GGAAAAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -6.23, deficit  2.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
GGUCGAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -5.00, deficit  1.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GAAAGGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.60, deficit  2.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
CUCGGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -7.18, deficit  3.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
GGAACAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -5.36, deficit  0.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GUCGAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -8.21, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
GGGGGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -7.38, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUUUCUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -5.75, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
CAGACAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_69774.3,  6 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -4.77, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.05, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAUAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.05, deficit  1.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  89.09, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGUCAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -6.15, deficit  2.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.62, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CUUUUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -4.65, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
CUGCGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -9.02, deficit  4.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.58, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUUUUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -4.65, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
GUCUAUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -5.62, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
GAAGCGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.88, deficit  1.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GAUAGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -8.20, deficit  3.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CGACAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -8.12, deficit  2.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CGACGGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.48, deficit  1.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.05, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GGUUCAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -8.28, deficit  2.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
GUUCUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -5.61, deficit  1.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
CACUUGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -7.58, deficit  2.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CACCACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -6.67, deficit  1.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UUAAACA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -6.51, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
GUCUGCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -7.13, deficit  2.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.96, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
AGACGGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.75, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGAUGAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -6.74, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
AGCUGAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -8.13, deficit  0.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.79, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
GCCCGAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.93, deficit  1.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAUGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -7.83, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CUAUUCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.96, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CCCUCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -6.99, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CCGAUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score      -9.91, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
CUAGCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -6.26, deficit  2.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CGGAGGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.32, deficit  2.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GAGUUAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score     -10.55, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
UUAAACCA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score     -10.07, deficit  6.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GCAUGGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score      -9.28, deficit  3.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UUCGUGUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -11.50, deficit  7.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CUCAUCUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score      -9.04, deficit  2.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUUUUCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_33172.1,  5 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -7.43, deficit  3.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.45, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F                   
CGAUCUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.79, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.70, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CGAAAAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -6.56, deficit  2.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUGAUGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score     -11.32, deficit  7.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.29, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CGGUCAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -8.82, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CAACGUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -12.71, deficit  3.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
CAAUCACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.90, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
CAGGUGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -11.24, deficit  3.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
CCCGCAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_18495.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -10.29, deficit  4.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.70, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35             
GUCACUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -8.20, deficit  4.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
CCUGCACG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_18495.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -10.71, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.30, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGCAAAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.38, deficit  1.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUAAAGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -7.52, deficit  3.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
AAUUCUGU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -7.33, deficit  2.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
GUAAGUUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -9.64, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CAAAAAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -8.42, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAAAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -6.56, deficit  2.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CAUAUCGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -9.98, deficit  2.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
UGAUGUGA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -10.40, deficit  5.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.75, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
AGUCCGAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -9.04, deficit  4.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
GAAGCAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -5.10, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.76, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
CCUUUGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score      -8.78, deficit  3.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
CUGAAAUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -5.46, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GACAUGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -10.60, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
CAUGUAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score      -9.31, deficit  3.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.17, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CCGGGCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -5.85, deficit  1.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GCUUCAAC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -6.23, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGUACAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -9.20, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CCAUUGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -7.44, deficit  1.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
CUGUCUCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -4.93, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
GUUCCUUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score     -10.35, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
GAAACAGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -4.00, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
AUUUUCUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score      -9.14, deficit  2.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
UGAAGAGA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -7.96, deficit  4.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
AUCAUUUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -12.13, deficit  5.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
CACCUCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -7.63, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
UAAAAGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.54, deficit  2.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.40, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUCUUUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -9.72, deficit  5.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
UGGAGAAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -7.51, deficit  3.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGUAAGAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -7.01, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.10, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGAGCAGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -7.22, deficit  1.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.88, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGGAGUAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -8.29, deficit  4.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.68, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGCCCAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -9.97, deficit  3.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CAUAUUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_38646.2,  7 NTs,              GGUAAUGC,score      -7.83, deficit  3.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AUUGCAUU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score     -12.17, deficit  5.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGCAAAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.15, deficit  0.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AGAUAAGAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -10.23, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGUUCAAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_72066.1,  8 NTs,             UGUUCAAAG,score      -7.18, deficit  2.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.83, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35           
GUUCAUUUC 1  Matches 12; best is HL_33239.14,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAUUC,score      -6.60, deficit  3.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
AGAACGGGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -8.77, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
AGCAAAUAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_36421.4,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score     -12.11, deficit  8.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUUCACUUG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score      -7.06, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
CAAAGAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -8.32, deficit  3.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
GCUGGAAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_73266.3,  9 NTs,             ACCGUAAAU,score      -6.32, deficit  0.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35 
GGUUUGAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score      -8.36, deficit  1.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.31, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
UUGAAGCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -16.16, deficit 11.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.20, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
GUCGAAUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -12.75, deficit  7.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
GAAAAAAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -7.14, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAUAAAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.48, deficit  3.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CCAACUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -10.99, deficit  4.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
CCAGCGCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -12.83, deficit  5.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.01, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
ACCCGGAUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -11.34, deficit  3.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.09, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UUGAAAACA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.23, deficit  0.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGGAAAGGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.70, deficit  5.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GUUCAACUC 1  Matches 14; best is HL_33239.14,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAUUC,score      -5.20, deficit  2.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CCCGAAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -11.51, deficit  3.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.07, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UGAUAUGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -10.83, deficit  2.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUCUUCUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score      -8.92, deficit  3.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55               
AGAAAAAAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.91, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GACUGCAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -8.44, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
UUUUUCUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score     -10.88, deficit  5.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55               
GUCAAAAUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -8.64, deficit  1.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
GCCUUCUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_33172.1,  5 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -9.91, deficit  5.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F                   
CUAAAAGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -9.13, deficit  5.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CGUCACGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_41851.1,  9 NTs,             CCUUACGAG,score      -9.88, deficit  4.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.20, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35 
CUCGAAUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -9.52, deficit  3.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
GAAAACGAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -9.15, deficit  4.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GAUGAAUAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score      -8.77, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
GAAAACAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.78, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
CUCCAAAUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score      -9.88, deficit  5.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
CAGGAUUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -10.23, deficit  2.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GAGGCAGGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -10.30, deficit  5.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
GAGCACCAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -7.30, deficit  2.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GACAGAUGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -7.27, deficit  2.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.02, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
GUUAAACCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.31, deficit  1.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUGAACACG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score     -10.27, deficit  1.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GAGGAUCCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -11.31, deficit  3.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.22, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
GGCCUAAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -7.89, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
CUACUCGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -7.75, deficit  2.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
UGAUCCUAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_36421.4,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score     -10.66, deficit  7.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AGGCGAAAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.17, deficit  0.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGUACAGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_18495.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -10.54, deficit  4.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35             
CCUUGAGAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_27335.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score      -7.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35                     
CAUGAGAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score     -10.12, deficit  4.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.70, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
GUCCCAGUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -13.79, deficit  3.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GAAAAGAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -8.24, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AUGACGACCU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -10.10, deficit  2.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.98, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUCAUAAACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score      -8.20, deficit  4.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
AGGAGUGUGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -11.43, deficit  5.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.01, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
ACGUAUUGUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.76, deficit  4.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.25, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
GCCAGGGACC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -11.94, deficit  5.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.20, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CAGGCGAGCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -11.69, deficit  2.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.19, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
AAUUGAUAAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score     -10.02, deficit  3.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
CGGGUUGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -10.36, deficit  3.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.96, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUUGUUAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -14.97, deficit  9.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.48, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AAAGAGGAAU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score      -6.50, deficit  0.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.31, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGUCACAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.62, deficit  1.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.36, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUACCCUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.67, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.82, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
UUUCAAGGUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.65, deficit  7.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GCAAAGGAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -7.62, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UUCUCAUACA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -12.31, deficit  3.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
CUCUGCGGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_03847.1, 10 NTs,            GCUGGCGGUC,score     -11.54, deficit  4.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGGCUCGCGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.20, deficit  4.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CACGCCGGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score      -9.76, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.98, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-F                               
UGAGGUCGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -13.48, deficit  5.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
ACGAAAAUCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -11.46, deficit  6.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
GGCUGAAAAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score      -6.38, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
CUCGAUGGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -10.49, deficit  1.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.89, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
CGAGAGUCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score      -9.31, deficit  2.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.90, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGAUAUUAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -12.01, deficit  5.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
AAUUCGCGGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -16.25, deficit 10.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGGCAAGGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.73, deficit  6.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.22, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GAUAAUCAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -12.47, deficit  5.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.47, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
GCUAAGCAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -13.24, deficit  6.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
UGCUAAAAAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score      -7.51, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
CGAUGGAUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -14.55, deficit  4.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
AAAGUAAGAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -9.66, deficit  1.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
GGAAUUGAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -7.38, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UUUUGUUGCA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.09, deficit  2.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.61, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAGGACAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -13.84, deficit  7.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.16, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGGAGUGAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -8.47, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUCAACAAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score      -8.47, deficit  2.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.02, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
CGAAUGUAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -10.70, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGCCGAAGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -10.97, deficit  1.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUCGAGACUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score      -8.47, deficit  2.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.02, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
CACAGGAGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score      -9.35, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
UGUUACUCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -10.95, deficit  1.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.01, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AAAUUGAGAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -12.54, deficit  2.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CGAAUGAUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -11.80, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUAUGAGUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -11.88, deficit  4.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
CAGAUUCAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.53, deficit  3.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.26, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
CUCCGGAUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score      -7.96, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.16, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
GGUAAUGCAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -10.69, deficit  2.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.20, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
UGUCGAUAGA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -14.31, deficit  4.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.21, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
GGAUUAUCGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -12.26, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.92, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
CGGAAACAGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -11.91, deficit  3.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.81, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAAGGGAAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -13.00, deficit  7.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
CAGGACGCCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -10.04, deficit  2.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.38, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
CGAGAUAAGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -13.53, deficit  6.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.32, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUCUUUGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.09, deficit  5.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.65, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CAGUUAAUUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_81327.2,  5 NTs,            CAGCCGGUAG,score     -14.52, deficit  6.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
GUCAUUCAAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -12.57, deficit  5.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
GACUUAAAAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score      -7.75, deficit  0.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.42, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAAGAGAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.16, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.16, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
CGAUCAGACAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -12.35, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.40, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
GGUGAAGAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -15.32, deficit  9.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGAAAGCCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -13.79, deficit  5.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.20, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
CGGGAUUAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -13.56, deficit  6.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUGAUUCCGUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -13.55, deficit  6.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.98, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CGAUGGUAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -14.00, deficit  4.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.90, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UAAAUGCAAAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score      -9.11, deficit  4.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
GAUAAAUUAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.24, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
AGUUGAAAUGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -11.72, deficit  2.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.09, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGAAACGGGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -13.80, deficit  6.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.48, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUUCGUUCUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -10.69, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
CGAAGAAUCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -12.59, deficit  8.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.77, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UAGUAAUGGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -13.26, deficit  5.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
ACGAUAUCAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.02, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
GUUCUUGGGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -11.64, deficit  4.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.09, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CGAAUAUGGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -11.09, deficit  4.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CUCGGGAAGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -15.44, deficit  6.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.41, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
GGAGAACUGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -13.36, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.28, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
GGGUCGAUAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.32, deficit  4.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.30, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CAAAAUAGACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20891.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -11.65, deficit  4.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55       
CUAACGAAAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -13.64, deficit  6.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.92, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
UGAAGGAAAAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -11.24, deficit  5.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.94, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
UGUGAGCCCAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -16.45, deficit  8.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.90, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
UAUUGUACGGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -11.73, deficit  2.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.74, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUUAAUCAGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -16.00, deficit  8.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.01, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUAAAGUUCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -11.68, deficit  4.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.83, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
AUGACGUGGUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -10.84, deficit  3.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CGUUGGCAAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score      -9.66, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CCGUUGGAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -14.59, deficit  5.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.51, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GACUCUAGUGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -14.08, deficit  5.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.06, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
CAAAGUGCAAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -13.88, deficit  8.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
CCCAAACGAUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -14.13, deficit  5.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.07, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUCUGUGAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -15.62, deficit  8.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CGCAAAAAGUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -13.05, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.66, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
UGCGCUUGGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -16.21, deficit  7.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.42, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
UGAAGAUUGCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.90, deficit  5.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.33, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGGAUUGAGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -14.58, deficit  7.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CGAAAUAAACAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -11.69, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
CGAACUCCGGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -14.27, deficit  5.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.30, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CACGACUGCAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -14.08, deficit  5.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.09, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
CGAAAGCAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.05, deficit  3.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUCCGGAAGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -14.73, deficit  5.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.23, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
UGAACGAAUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -14.24, deficit  6.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
GGAGACUGAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -16.23, deficit  9.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.58, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
CGAGCUGGAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_35188.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -15.10, deficit  8.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.13, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s33-F                       
CGAAUGCUUUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.42, deficit  4.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.72, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGUGCCCACAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -14.14, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.02, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAAAUAAAGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -10.08, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.29, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
GGAAAGUAUUAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -12.00, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.43, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAGUCGAGACAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -15.02, deficit  4.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.01, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AACUCAGCAUAGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70505.1, 11 NTs,          GAUCAGCCAUGC,score     -17.46, deficit 10.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.83, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35
CACCCUGGUUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_10751.2,  8 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -16.96, deficit 10.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33                   
GGGCAUUAGGAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -12.96, deficit  6.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.91, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
CGAAUGUCUAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -11.54, deficit  3.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
CUUUAGCCCAGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38011.1, 13 NTs,        GCUUAGAAGCAGCC,score     -17.76, deficit  9.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.13, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AACCUUCUCAACU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93221.1, 13 NTs,        GACCUAGAUCACCC,score     -16.22, deficit  6.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.02, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35 
CGGAAGAGUAUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -17.21, deficit  8.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGGAUUGAUAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -15.59, deficit  7.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
CCGAGGGCCGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58733.1, 12 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -15.83, deficit  5.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.76, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35 
CCAAAAGAUGACCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -16.00, deficit  8.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.95, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGUAGGACAUGAGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85984.1, 14 NTs,        UUUCAGAGAUGAGA,score     -16.82, deficit  6.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.86, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
UGAAUCAAAAUUAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_28843.1, 14 NTs,       UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA,score     -13.47, deficit -0.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.85, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35
ACUUAGGUAUAGCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38011.1, 13 NTs,        GCUUAGAAGCAGCC,score     -13.87, deficit  6.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.79, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UAUGAUUUGCUUUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07579.1, 14 NTs,      UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA,score     -19.31, deficit 10.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
4	100.0000	 84.9000	 77.4000	4
5	100.0000	 88.8000	 50.9000	23
6	100.0000	 87.1000	 51.2000	60
7	 99.6000	 54.6000	 15.7000	51
8	 99.6000	 27.0000	  5.0000	46
9	 98.6000	 18.7000	  2.1000	68
10	 95.0000	  7.3000	  0.1000	41
11	 83.8000	  3.3000	  0.0000	42
12	 44.9000	  0.5000	  0.0000	23
13	 18.6000	  0.4000	  0.0000	12
14	  6.1000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  1.2000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  1.3000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.6000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.4000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.1000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence 102 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence 135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence 143 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence 150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence 150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence 155 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence 155 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence 155 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence 156 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence 156 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence 157 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence 159 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence 161 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence 168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence 169 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence 171 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence 171 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence 171 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence 171 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence 171 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence 174 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence 174 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence 177 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence 177 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence 179 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence 182 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence 186 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence 189 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence 189 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence 189 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence 193 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence 195 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence 196 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence 197 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence 198 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence 198 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence 198 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence 199 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence 201 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence 201 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence 202 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence 204 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence 205 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence 205 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence 205 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence 207 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence 207 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence 207 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence 208 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence 208 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence 208 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence 209 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence 209 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence 209 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence 210 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence 211 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence 211 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence 211 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence 211 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence 212 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence 212 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence 214 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence 215 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence 216 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence 217 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence 218 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence 219 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence 220 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence 221 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence 221 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence 222 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence 229 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence 230 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence 231 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence 235 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence 235 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence 235 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence 237 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence 238 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence 239 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence 241 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence 242 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence 242 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence 243 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence 243 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence 246 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence 247 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence 249 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence 253 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence 254 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence 255 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence 257 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence 259 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence 259 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence 260 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence 269 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence 272 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence 273 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence 274 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence 276 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence 284 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence 285 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence 286 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence 291 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence 293 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence 293 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence 294 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence 296 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence 337 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence 345 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence 356 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence 359 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence 363 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence 363 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence 367 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence 372 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence 402 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 413 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence 417 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 422 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence 435 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 444 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 461 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 468 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 473 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 489 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 506 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 507 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 517 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 521 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 529 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 556 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 571 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 582 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 603 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 612 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 645 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 682 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 685 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 688 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 691 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 697 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 700 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 709 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 731 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 743 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 782 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 794 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 824 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 881 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 918 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 942 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 978 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 1026 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 1026 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 1069 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 1088 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 1090 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 1096 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 1099 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 1109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 1149 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 1471 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 1479 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 1629 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 2028 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.4083%
Number of models giving false positives is 304 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     8.43
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.53
